TY  - Type of reference 
TI  - Aesthetics today? Three arguments in favor of its rehabilitation 
AU  - Alice Dupas 
AB  - If I refuse to abandon aesthetics as a discipline as well as an experience, it is because of at least three arguments. The first is that contemporary art, even when it is most overtly conceptual and intellectualized, does not entirely contravene the aesthetic, that is, the sensitive and affective, dimension of its experience. A second argument determines that even the contemporary philosophy that is most concerned with desesthetising art –that of Arthur Danto– is not inherently anaesthetic. The last argument, definitely the main one since it rests on the theory of art I am defending, maintains that the latter – the enactive sense-making aesthetics– operates from Alexander Baumgarten’s seminal aesthetics and extends it on a crucial point, by making it a constitutively embodied cognitive aesthetics. 
DO  - 10.21494/ISTE.OP.2023.0943 
JF  - Art and Science 
KW  - Aesthetic Experience,  Arthur Danto,  Embodied Aesthetics,  Cognitive Aesthetics,  Enactive Sense-Making Aesthetics,  Alfonsina Scarinzi,  Alfonsina Scarinzi,  Esthétique énactive sense-making,  Esthétique cognitive,  Esthétique incarnée,  Arthur Danto, Expérience esthétique,  
L1  - https://www.openscience.fr/IMG/pdf/iste_artsci23v7n1_4.pdf 
LA  - en 
PB  - ISTE OpenScience 
DA  - 2023/03/14 
SN  - 2515-8767 
TT  - L’esthétique aujourd’hui ? Trois arguments en faveur de sa réhabilitation 
UR  - https://www.openscience.fr/Aesthetics-today-Three-arguments-in-favor-of-its-rehabilitation 
IS  - Issue 1 
VL  - 7 
ER  -